Hi,
Many thanks for the many answers.
I went for the SPARQL solution in the end since I only have a short list of Q-numbers which can be sources. With the new query service it also has the benefit of being something I can just turn into a url and then give to the GLAM to look up on the fly =)
Now I also have an excuse to learn some more SPARQL to play around with this =)
Cheers, André
André Costa | GLAM-tekniker, Wikimedia Sverige | Andre.Costa@wikimedia.se | +46 (0)733-964574
Stöd fri kunskap, bli medlem i Wikimedia Sverige. Läs mer på blimedlem.wikimedia.se
On 7 September 2015 at 22:29, Stas Malyshev smalyshev@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi!
A small fix though: I think you should better use count(?statement) rather than count(?ref), right?
Yes, of course, my mistake - I modified it from different query and forgot to change it.
I have tried a similar query on the public test endpoint on labs earlier, but it timed out for me (I was using a very common reference though ;-). For rarer references, live queries are definitely the better approach.
Works for me for Q216047, didn't check others though. For a popular references, labs one may be too slow, indeed. A faster one is coming "real soon now" :)
-- Stas Malyshev smalyshev@wikimedia.org
Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata