Hi,

Many thanks for the many answers.

I went for the SPARQL solution in the end since I only have a short list of Q-numbers which can be sources. With the new query service it also has the benefit of being something I can just turn into a url and then give to the GLAM to look up on the fly =)

Now I also have an excuse to learn some more SPARQL to play around with this =)

Cheers,
André

André Costa | GLAM-tekniker, Wikimedia Sverige | Andre.Costa@wikimedia.se | +46 (0)733-964574

Stöd fri kunskap, bli medlem i Wikimedia Sverige.
Läs mer på blimedlem.wikimedia.se

On 7 September 2015 at 22:29, Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hi!

> A small fix though: I think you should better use count(?statement)
> rather than count(?ref), right?

Yes, of course, my mistake - I modified it from different query and
forgot to change it.

> I have tried a similar query on the public test endpoint on labs
> earlier, but it timed out for me (I was using a very common reference
> though ;-). For rarer references, live queries are definitely the better
> approach.

Works for me for Q216047, didn't check others though. For a popular
references, labs one may be too slow, indeed. A faster one is coming
"real soon now" :)

--
Stas Malyshev
smalyshev@wikimedia.org

_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata