Hello,
Sorry, but what has "the new head of the WMF" to do with the community matters of Wikidata?
Greetings,
Sjoerd de Bruin sjoerddebruin@me.com
Op 31 jul. 2016, om 19:18 heeft Info WorldUniversity info@worlduniversityandschool.org het volgende geschreven:
Thanks Andy for helping focus these developing process questions. What role could the new head of the WMF play here in positive regards?
Regards, Scott
On Jul 31, 2016 10:09 AM, "Andy Mabbett" <andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk mailto:andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote: On 31 July 2016 at 16:43, Adrian Raddatz <ajraddatz@gmail.com mailto:ajraddatz@gmail.com> wrote:
my personal opinion is that these items are fine as well. But (and here's the important thing), it's not a big deal either way. The site will continue, and this especially should not be a time for trying to force an opinion one way or the other onto the community. :-)
The big deal is about how we decide how Wikidata policies are applied
- do we seek to obtain community consensus, or do we allow involved
admins to decide by fait accompli?
-- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk http://pigsonthewing.org.uk/
Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org mailto:Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata _______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata