The DBnary project "Wiktionary as Linguistic Linked Open Data" at:
http://kaiko.getalp.org/about-dbnary/
http://kaiko.getalp.org/sparql
can be used as a reference.
I am basing my IEG project to visualize etymologies from Wktionary on it:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IEG/A_graphical_and_interactive_etym…
is based on at project/
Cheers,
Ester
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Daniel Kinzler <daniel.kinzler(a)wikimedia.de
wrote:
Am 21.09.2016 um 19:23 schrieb Eric Scott:
A substantial amount of work in the LOD community
seems to have gone
into Ontolex:
Thanks for pointing to this!
From a first look, the models seem to roughly align:
What we call a "Lexeme" corresponds to a "Lexical Entry" in ontolex.
What we call a "Form" corresponds to a "Form" in ontolex.
What we call a "Sense" corresponds to a "Lexical Sense &
Reference" in
ontolex,
although in ontolex, a reference to a Concept is required, while in our
model
that reference would be optional, but a natural language gloss is required.
So the models seem to match fine on a conceptual level. Perhaps someone
with
more expertise in RDF modeling can provide a more detailed analysis.
--
Daniel Kinzler
Senior Software Developer
Wikimedia Deutschland
Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V.
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata