To add to Andy's reply, on Wikidata the combination of Ranking ( https://m.wikidata.org/wiki/Help:Ranking) , Qualifier ( https://m.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Help:Qualifiers) and References (https://m.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Help:Sources) would enable storing disputed property values. So, it does make sense.
-fariz
On Mon, May 7, 2018, 19:27 Andy Mabbett andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
On 7 May 2018 at 00:15, Sylvain Boissel sylvainboissel@gmail.com wrote:
Le sam. 5 mai 2018 à 16:35, Andy Mabbett andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk a
écrit
On 5 May 2018 at 14:39, David Abián davidabian@wikimedia.es wrote:
Both Wikidata and DBpedia surely can, and should, coexist because
we'll
never be able to host in Wikidata the entirety of the Wikipedias.
Can you give an example of something that can be represented in DBpedia, but not Wikidata?
Sure : DBpedia knows the specific values different versions of Wikipedia choose to display in the infobox. For example, the size or population of countries with disputed borders. This data is useful for researchers
working
on cultural bias in Wikipedia, but it makes little sense to store it in Wikidata.
Except that does; and Wikidata is more than capable of holding values from conflicting sources. So again, this does not substantiate the "Both Wikidata and DBpedia surely can, and should, coexist because we'll never be able to host in Wikidata the entirety of the Wikipedias" claim.
-- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata