would enable storing disputed property values. So, it does make sense.
On Mon, May 7, 2018, 19:27 Andy Mabbett <andy(a)pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:
On 7 May 2018 at 00:15, Sylvain Boissel
Le sam. 5 mai 2018 à 16:35, Andy Mabbett
> On 5 May 2018 at 14:39, David Abián
> > Both Wikidata and DBpedia surely can, and should, coexist because
> > never be able to host in Wikidata the
entirety of the Wikipedias.
> Can you give an example of something that can be represented in
> DBpedia, but not Wikidata?
Sure : DBpedia knows the specific values
different versions of Wikipedia
choose to display in the infobox. For example, the size or population of
countries with disputed borders. This data is useful for researchers
on cultural bias in Wikipedia, but it makes
little sense to store it in
Except that does; and Wikidata is more than capable of holding values
from conflicting sources. So again, this does not substantiate the
"Both Wikidata and DBpedia surely can, and should, coexist because
we'll never be able to host in Wikidata the entirety of the
Wikidata mailing list