** Hi Aaron and everyone, This is a really painful thing for me to read. As a scholar, my research work has been based around the representation of Indigenous peoples of North America in media and culture. I sincerely doubt that any of the "tribal members" I know would say that this is a valid work that would showcase their Indigenous cultures as anything but another stereotype. Just as I'm sure some women of Tahiti today would question the relevance today of Gauguin's paintings which often showcased nude or partially nude Tahitian women - art revered by both genders and the Western art world. However, I'm not seeking to speak on behalf of these individuals and communities, nor am I hear to discuss the creators goal or context with this featured image. It's more of the fact that *this* is considered a choice for the featured front page and the concern that it has given me as a female contributor to Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons, etc. You also stated that you do not want to compromise "our core values just to try to close a "gap" that some feel is such a big issue, if it even exists." This gap does exist, in fact an entire mailing list (which I have cc'd here and I encourage anyone interested in the topic to join) was created to work towards bridging this gap. This was triggered by an article titled "Define Gender Gap? Look Up Wikipedia's Contributor List" by Noam Cohen, published Jan 30 2011 in *The New York Times*: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/31/business/media/31link.html A great and interesting conversation took place by NYT to reflect on this situation, which you can read here: http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2011/02/02/where-are-the-women-in-wiki… I do hope that perhaps those two articles can show you that there *is *a problem, and there are many concerned Wikipedians of all genders, skin tones, and identities aiming to change that. That is when images like this deter us from our expansive mission to be more inclusive. And this has nothing to do with me being "sensitive to toplessness" - you don't know anything about my lifestyle or character to assume that, regardless of where I live or where I was born. #wikilove, Sarah On 5/15/2011 10:53 PM, Aaron Adrignola wrote: Commons is not censored. It's a beautiful scene and it would be expected that the an imaginary tribal member would not have the American sensitivities to toplessness. Some images may offend. Some articles may offend. We're not going to compromise our core values just to try to close a "gap" that some feel is such a big issue, if it even exists. On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 9:31 PM, CherianTinu Abraham < tinucherian(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: Wikipedia Regional Ambassador, D.C. Region Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives of American Art -- Sarah Stierch Consulting Historical, cultural & artistic research, advising & event planning. ------------------------------------------------------ http://www.sarahstierch.com/ _______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap