All I can suggest is - he can create a proposal and support and test it :)
Perhaps it will work some magic that we can all benefit from!
Sarah
Sent via iPhone - I apologize in advance for my shortness or errors! :)
On Nov 28, 2011, at 3:04 AM, rupert THURNER <rupert.thurner(a)gmail.com> wrote:
as I understood drjunges remarks, post-it notes bring
a personal, non-public component, which lowers the edit barrier. depending on the
implementation, they are able to extend, replace or provide e.g.: page watch, classical
note glued onto or over text or images, categories, tags, bookmarks, share the post-its to
me, groups or public, editing templates (a la "this article needs help"),
quality categorisation to select contents for offline.
in a summary, while I always thought wikipedia is not facebook, such notes offer a wealth
of new applications, which we are not even able to enumerate currently.
rupert
On Nov 27, 2011 11:43 PM, "Sarah Stierch" <sarah.stierch(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
I don't think women are "scared" or disinterested to participate because of
images on Wikipedia. People are uncomfortable about certain images regardless of gender,
just like people having a hard time with wiki-mark up is genderless. But, that's just
speaking for my experiences, research and role in English Wikipedia.
I don't really think post-it note type tools would benefit Wikipedia any more or less
than the image filter would, and that idea has basically been shot down. It also sounds
like the user of the post-it note would have to view the image to place the post-it on top
of the image, so I'm not too sure what the benefit would be.
-Sarah
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi(a)gmx.net> wrote:
* rupert THURNER wrote:
to increase female participation, drjunge suggests
to implement "post-it"s.
they can be placed on any position into wikipedia pages, and are only
personally viewable in a first step. later the visibility might be extended
just like with other social networks. one funny side-usage of these
post-its is that they of course can be placed onto images one does not like.
as i am not female and not non-participating, i'd wonder what you think
about such an idea?
If you want to close the "gendergap" then you have to think about how to
turn 10% female participation into 90% female participation.
--
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de ·
http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 ·
http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 ·
http://www.websitedev.de/
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
--
Sarah Stierch Consulting
Historical, cultural & artistic research & advising.
------------------------------------------------------
http://www.sarahstierch.com/
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap