I don't think women are "scared" or disinterested to participate because of images on Wikipedia.  People are uncomfortable about certain images regardless of gender, just like people having a hard time with wiki-mark up is genderless. But, that's just speaking for my experiences, research and role in English Wikipedia.

I don't really think post-it note type tools would benefit Wikipedia any more or less than the image filter would, and that idea has basically been shot down. It also sounds like the user of the post-it note would have to view the image to place the post-it on top of the image, so I'm not too sure what the benefit would be.

-Sarah


On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote:
* rupert THURNER wrote:
>to increase female participation, drjunge suggests to implement "post-it"s.
>they can be placed on any position into wikipedia pages, and are only
>personally viewable in a first step. later the visibility might be extended
>just like with other social networks. one funny side-usage of these
>post-its is that they of course can be placed onto images one does not like.
>
>as i am not female and not non-participating, i'd wonder what you think
>about such an idea?

If you want to close the "gendergap" then you have to think about how to
turn 10% female participation into 90% female participation.
--
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap



--

Sarah Stierch Consulting
Historical, cultural & artistic research & advising.
------------------------------------------------------
http://www.sarahstierch.com/