On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 7:36 AM, SlimVirgin slimvirgin@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 14:11, Fred Bauder fredbaud@fairpoint.net wrote:
Should we discuss such problems or should such posts have been rejected by a moderator or the poster warned and required to revise their post?
I have high toleration for disorder, but have found lately that wholesale deletion has been useful when I get behind. The conversations here have not been substantial or focused enough to command sustained attention.
I wouldn't mind seeing more moderation. I've just changed my preferences to digest mode, which means I'm going to miss things, but it was becoming too much and not focused enough.
I wonder whether it would make sense to have two lists -- one for Wikipedia-specific suggestions, and another for the broader issues.
"Wikipedia-specific suggestions" seems better to be defined as English Wikipedia suggestions. It would be a good practice of thought why those questions came here, not to other and solid Wikipedia dedicated fora, wikipedia@lists. wikimedia.org or its sister EnWP specific list.
Have you girls and guys never known those two lists? Or ...?
Sarah
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap