On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 7:36 AM, SlimVirgin <slimvirgin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 14:11, Fred Bauder
<fredbaud(a)fairpoint.net> wrote:
Should we discuss such problems or should such
posts have been rejected
by a moderator or the poster warned and required to revise their post?
I have high toleration for disorder, but have found lately that wholesale
deletion has been useful when I get behind. The conversations here have
not been substantial or focused enough to command sustained attention.
I wouldn't mind seeing more moderation. I've just changed my
preferences to digest mode, which means I'm going to miss things, but
it was becoming too much and not focused enough.
I wonder whether it would make sense to have two lists -- one for
Wikipedia-specific suggestions, and another for the broader issues.
"Wikipedia-specific suggestions" seems better to be defined as English
Wikipedia suggestions. It would be a good practice of thought why
those questions came here, not to other and solid Wikipedia dedicated
fora, wikipedia@lists.
wikimedia.org or its sister EnWP specific list.
Have you girls and guys never known those two lists? Or ...?
Sarah
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
--
KIZU Naoko / 木津尚子
member of Wikimedians in Kansai / 関西ウィキメディアユーザ会
http://kansai.wikimedia.jp