As said, we need a proper survey on the matter. Surveys are always going to
be beset with statistical errors, but this seems a fairly vital thing. I
think I mentioned before that, last year, the WMF did a general survey of
people who had left Wikipedia and why. I think a good first step would be
finding out where that data is and, if it included gender in the filled-out
forms, comparing male and female reasons for leaving. If it did not, take
the general statistical model and apply it again, including a gender entry,
and compare the results.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Sandra ordonez
<sandratordonez(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
I think it does affect women more, but this is just my
personal
observation. And I should have put "typical response I ve gotten from
women." This is why i love wikipedia - really helps you be very aware of
your language. Thanks Oliver!!
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Oliver Keyes <scire.facias(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
Yah, that's what I meant; newbie ignorance
isn't a problem. Our attitude
to newbie ignorance is the problem :P. This is something I think all new
editors are at risk of (being shouted at and falling off the grid as a
result) - I'm not sure why it would affect women more, or if it does at all.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:13 PM, Dominic <dmcdevit(a)cox.net> wrote:
Newbie ignorance is never a problem. All newbies
are, by nature,
ignorant of our policies and practices. We all started out that way. And the
great thing about wikis is that that is okay and you can still contribute.
If anything, the problem is intolerance of newbies. (That may be what you
really meant anyway, but I think it is better to turn that phrase "newbie
ignorance" around.)
Dominic
On 2/11/11 5:49 PM, Oliver Keyes wrote:
"Typical response from some women" should be "a response from a
woman".
So the problem, then, is newbie ignorance about our rules and policies?
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:41 PM, Sandra ordonez <
sandratordonez(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Just wanted to share. Yesterday I put something
on my facebook re:
gender gap. My friend from high school, who totally would be a woman who
would enjoy editing an encyclopedia, posted the following:
"Whenever I edit it usually gets taken down but some OCD nerd, that
probably wants no one touching "their" site so I stopped bothering."
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing
listGendergap@lists.wikimedia.orghttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
--
Sandra Ordonez
Web Astronaut
"Helping you rock out in the virtual world."
*www.collaborativenation.com*
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap