Yah, that's what I meant; newbie ignorance isn't a problem. Our attitude to newbie ignorance is the problem :P. This is something I think all new editors are at risk of (being shouted at and falling off the grid as a result) - I'm not sure why it would affect women more, or if it does at all.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:13 PM, Dominic <dmcdevit@cox.net> wrote:Newbie ignorance is never a problem. All newbies are, by nature, ignorant of our policies and practices. We all started out that way. And the great thing about wikis is that that is okay and you can still contribute. If anything, the problem is intolerance of newbies. (That may be what you really meant anyway, but I think it is better to turn that phrase "newbie ignorance" around.)
Dominic
On 2/11/11 5:49 PM, Oliver Keyes wrote:"Typical response from some women" should be "a response from a woman". So the problem, then, is newbie ignorance about our rules and policies?
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:41 PM, Sandra ordonez <sandratordonez@gmail.com> wrote:
Just wanted to share. Yesterday I put something on my facebook re: gender gap. My friend from high school, who totally would be a woman who would enjoy editing an encyclopedia, posted the following:
"Whenever I edit it usually gets taken down but some OCD nerd, that probably wants no one touching "their" site so I stopped bothering."
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
_______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap