Can anyone point to where this "troll" behavior happened? There don't seem
to be a lot of specifics in this article, and I'm wondering if it's gender
trolls (which are, alas, plentiful) or a culture clash between old editors
and new ones over unfamiliar policies?
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Carol Moore dc <carolmooredc(a)verizon.net>
wrote:
On 4/10/2015 6:33 PM, Siko Bouterse wrote:
This is the grant proposal referenced at the end
of that article
(currently under review as part of Inspire):
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/More_
Female_Architects_on_Wikipedia
I remember NOT commenting on that one because I figured, who could have
a problem
with that?
How soon we forget that getting MORE women articles and editors was and
remains controversial.
Banging head vs. wall....
CM
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please
visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap