Right now, I think that we should assume that most people value their
privacy, and unless they have actively given consent for a nude image
we
should delete it to protect their right to privacy, and the right to
control
the way that their photograph is used.
Sydney
User:FloNight
Yes, the rule should be that personally identifying images should be
routinely suppressed in the absence of permission from an identifiable
person who has signed an informed release. An informed release would
include a declaration that they understand how open source image
licensing works.
There are privacy issues. Can a person remain anonymous and release an
image of themselves. If so, how, in the case of Commons or Wikipedia?
We routinely use the oversight tool on the English Wikipedia to suppress
phone numbers and home addresses as releases of personal information.
Fred
If a person is identifiable to their social set, family, or even to just
themselves, permission should be required if there is sexual or sexually
suggestive content.
Fred