Hi folks,
I'm wondering if anyone here has examples of articles that contain
potentially-objectionable imagery being significantly improved
following normal discussion among editors?
I'm looking for examples of good editorial judgment being exercised in
the normal article improvement processes -- like, an upskirt image
being removed from the 'skirt' article, or, commercial porn being
replaced by images that are more informative/educational. That kind of
thing.
I know that kind of editing happens all the time -- I'm hoping people
here can point me towards particularly good examples.
Thanks,
Sue
--
Sue Gardner
Executive Director
Wikimedia Foundation
415 839 6885 office
415 816 9967 cell
Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in
the sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality!
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate