I've never particularly felt the "boys club" atmosphere on Wikipedia that apparently deters some women. However, I am very angry right now. I tried to add [[date rape]] as a "see also" link to the very incomplete article [[college dating]]. The relevance seemed obvious to me. It was removed by two separate people, and when I took it to the talk page, its relevance was questioned, and I was told to "prove it" because it was "obvious to whom?" Fine. I've proven it with sourcing, adding a small section. I think that needed to happen anyway, but I'm infuriated that I could not just add a see also link to it and tell the students who are really working on the article that a section needed adding. (The people who removed the link are seasoned Wikipedians, not members of the class developing the article.) Am I crazy?
LadyofShalott