Hi again, Andreas.
In February you'd responded to Fred as followshttp://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-February/000204.html, concerning pornographic images in Commons:
*"I have given notice that I perceive there to be a problem on-Wiki many times, and the reply has always been the same: Wikipedia is not censored.
The suggestion that our editorial judgment with respect to illustration should reflect and be based on the judgment our sources exercise in that regard has not gone down well. We are all agreed that when it comes to text content, we must follow sources. When it comes to images, however, the community claims the freedom to apply its own ("OR") standards, which naturally reflect our skewed demographics."*
Yes, after reading this thread I wandered through that hall of mirrors that discussions of Sexual Content policies and guidelines constitute on Commons
Yes, they can't even have a picture of a vacuum cleaner without it having sexual subtext, see
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/wiki/File:Imitation_of_Christ...
This, of course, is art, see
http://blog.shankbone.org/2009/08/05/tara-subkoff-imitation-of-christ-public...
He's been a major contributor of images of New York celebrities.
It is art. Perhaps being out of focus adds to it; playful and interesting, and quite original, which is the point you made above.
Note, of course, that it is performance art in the form of a fashion show choreographed by a woman.
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/wiki/Tara_Subkoff
Fred