Not true.
In fact the careless way that these images are categorized and linked to
inappropriate articles is one of my main concerns.
Often sexually explicit or sexually titillating images placed in very
mundane categories like electric fan, couch, or coca cola.
So when these topic are linked to Commons the sexual content appears without
the person expecting it.
My attempts to fix this on a case by case basis are often reverted.
When I discuss it with the some of the people reverting, I'm told that I
denying people the ability to find these images...censorship.
Sydney
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Nepenthe <topazbutterfly(a)gmail.com> wrote:
An important point to remember about images depicting
sexual practices on
Wikipedia: one has to look for them. In order to see the image stirring so
much controversy, one actually has to visit "Bukkake". This isn't Playboy
calendars on the wall, it's Playboys under the mattress in a different city.
Unless our missing female contributors are entering through the site
through pornography and sexuality pages, it's relatively unlikely that they
will see any of these images. Perhaps it is possible to exclude them from
"Random page", in which case a person offended by the images would never see
them unless they looked for them specifically.
Nepenthe