I'm not so sure. As soon as the incident was noted, the article was
semi-protected, which solved the problem.
Perhaps you are suggesting flagged revisions for *all* biographies of
living persons (BLPs), by default?
-Pete
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Andreas Kolbe <jayen466(a)gmail.com> wrote:
This case presents a good argument for flagged
revisions. Given that the
people who made these edits weren't logged in, none of their additions and
changes would have been visible to the public.
Andreas
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 7:04 AM, <koltzenburg(a)w4w.net> wrote:
Hi Gillian,
thank you for this information
do you have any suggesting as a positive action that members of this list
might take, in this case as well as
generally?
open for suggestions,
Claudia
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:33:38 +1000, Gillian White wrote
Hi All,
The Community is aware of this and is discussing it. However, it's
worthwhile bringing to the attention of this list that one woman's
efforts
at studying gender stereotyping (reported in The New
Statesman<http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/internet/2012/06/dear-intern…
why-you-cant-have-anything-nice>) have resulted in massive and nasty
vandalism of Anita Sarkeesian's page on Wikipedia
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anita_Sarkeesian>.
Gillian
thanks & cheers,
Claudia
koltzenburg(a)w4w.net
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap