I'm not so sure. As soon as the incident was noted, the article was semi-protected, which solved the problem.
Perhaps you are suggesting flagged revisions for *all* biographies of living persons (BLPs), by default?
-Pete
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Andreas Kolbe jayen466@gmail.com wrote:
This case presents a good argument for flagged revisions. Given that the people who made these edits weren't logged in, none of their additions and changes would have been visible to the public.
Andreas
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 7:04 AM, koltzenburg@w4w.net wrote:
Hi Gillian,
thank you for this information
do you have any suggesting as a positive action that members of this list might take, in this case as well as generally?
open for suggestions, Claudia
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:33:38 +1000, Gillian White wrote
Hi All, The Community is aware of this and is discussing it. However, it's worthwhile bringing to the attention of this list that one woman's efforts at studying gender stereotyping (reported in The New
Statesmanhttp://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/internet/2012/06/dear-internet- why-you-cant-have-anything-nice) have resulted in massive and nasty vandalism of Anita Sarkeesian's page on Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anita_Sarkeesian. Gillian
thanks & cheers, Claudia koltzenburg@w4w.net
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap