At a minimum I would expect SuSa and/or Arbcom to conduct some meaningful investigation if there was an allegation of a functionary's trustworthiness. Perhaps (and I'm only speculating here) Arbcom and SuSa were unable to find enough hard evidence to support the allegation which is why nothing was done. I would suggest taking this matter up with Susa and Arbcom directly; perhaps they will be able to explain what they did (if anything) and what their findings were (if any). I'd understand if an investigation was done but they couldn't find enough evidence to support a revocation of functionary permissions; what would concern me more is if the matter was brought to their attention and they didn't investigate it at all.
Pine
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 6:19 AM, J Hayes slowking4@gmail.com wrote:
nope - this was an incident at wikiconUSA 2015 apparently nothing done which has impacted the credibility of arbcom and susa (i was not witness, but i find the complainants credible)
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:54 PM, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
I'm unfamiliar with this situation, but if there's a functionary whose off-wiki behavior calls into question of the appropriateness of his/her continuing to have access to PII, please do forward that information to SuSa, the Ombudsman Committee, and/or (as applicable) the local arbitration committee that would have the ability to investigate the situation.
Pine
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:29 PM, J Hayes slowking4@gmail.com wrote:
yes, that functionary and his behavior on meta has chilled the participation of some librarian editors they are highly skeptical of wiki harrassment efforts as long as he is in a position to see personal identifying information. they do not trust check user to be done responsibly as well
this is impacting our efforts to engage a GLAM institution.
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Neotarf neotarf@gmail.com wrote:
Speaking of dox and in-person events, a few months ago one of the WP:BADSITES known for dox had a thread about attending a WMF harassment workshop. So anyone who is not comfortable with a paper trail, and would prefer face-to-face conversations with allies, could actually find themselves face to face with their harassers instead.
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap