nope -
this was an incident at wikiconUSA 2015
apparently nothing done
which has impacted the credibility of arbcom and susa
(i was not witness, but i find the complainants credible)
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:54 PM, Pine W <wiki.pine(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I'm unfamiliar with this situation, but if
there's a functionary whose
off-wiki behavior calls into question of the appropriateness of his/her
continuing
to have access to PII, please do forward that information to SuSa, the
Ombudsman Committee, and/or (as applicable) the local arbitration committee
that would have the ability to investigate the situation.
Pine
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:29 PM, J Hayes <slowking4(a)gmail.com> wrote:
yes, that functionary and his behavior on meta
has chilled the
participation of some librarian editors
they are highly skeptical of wiki harrassment efforts as long as he is
in a position to see personal identifying information.
they do not trust check user to be done responsibly as well
this is impacting our efforts to engage a GLAM institution.
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Neotarf <neotarf(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Speaking of dox and in-person events, a few
months ago one of the
WP:BADSITES known for dox had a thread about attending a WMF
harassment workshop. So anyone who is not comfortable with a paper
trail, and would prefer face-to-face conversations with allies, could
actually find themselves face to face with their harassers instead.
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please
visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please
visit: