Re: [Gendergap] Amazon petition

and if English-Welsh law governed Wikipedia he could then sue for libel and have all that reliably-sourced truthful, and then make sure that the fact that it was removed reported in any news article that would show up in search results due to some “’right’ to be forgotten”. I'm still not sure what this has specifically to do with English-Welsh law, as opposed to the rest of the EU. As for the Guardian piece, I agree with the Information Commissioner's Office, https://ico.org.uk/about-the-ico/news-and-events/news-and-blogs/2015/08/ico… it's If, after Google removes links to the claimant's name, someone searches for the phrase "right to be forgotten", then they will find the claimant's name(s), just not the other way around. Which is is as it should be. Marie From: dancase(a)frontiernet.net To: gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 14:48:21 -0400 Subject: Re: [Gendergap] Amazon petition is the problem that I have with the whole notion of 'first amendment = trump card'. If he were British and self-published from a >laptop within the UK then he would be arrested for hate speech, and that would be the end of him and his book(s). Yes, and if English-Welsh law governed Wikipedia he could then sue for libel and have all that reliably-sourced critical material removed regardless of it being truthful, and then make sure that the fact that it was removed cannot be reported in any news article that would show up in search results due to some “’right’ to be forgotten”. Daniel Case _______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap