Yeah..I don't edit as much as I used to on
Wikipedia now. I am obsessed
with Wikidata and doing more work in Commons again (shocker). :) It's been
a while since i've even written an article. But, i do edit each day, just
little things, not as prolific as I once was. I'd gladly do it if I was a
Wikipedian in Residence again, I like having missions...and I'm burnt out
on writing about "women" on Wikipedia. And most of the major projects I've
started or been involved in have been completed to the point where I'm no
longer interested.
It just wears me out. I feel like every place I step on Wikipedia could
lead to me getting harassed or called out on something or whatever..it's
like walking on egg shells. This coming from a person who helped lead the
fight in creating 'nice' culture on Wikipedia. People just can't let things
go, and it just thwarts the energy and passion I have towards editing
myself.
But, i've had the pleasure of helping women around the world learn how to
edit, so I guess that whole idea of cloning myself sort of worked :)
-Sarah
-Sarah
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 8:27 AM, Carol Moore dc <carolmooredc(a)verizon.net
Good points, Jane Part of a hostile editing
environment is the
"either they ignore you or they insult you" phenomena. I'm sure a lot of
women do quit for just the reason Jane describes - being ignored.
I got that quoted phrase from a woman complaining about it in some
mainstream article a few years ago. That made a lot of my experiences in
email finally comprehensible. I found if I came up with a good idea, I
was ignored. If I said something a bit outrageous in conjunction with that
idea, some people might actually note the idea and comment on it, among all
the outraged guys complaining about whatever (unladylike?) comment I made
in conjunction with it.
By the time I came to Wikipedia I was aware of that behavior and trying
to find new strategies to get appropriate attention. Of course, on
Wikipedia one doesn't have to go out of one's way to get attention if one
regularly practices correcting editors, reverting them, seeking third
opinions or going to noticeboards, any of which some editors also consider
outrageous - particularly if the editor is perceived as being a women.
Of course, if the editors in a specific culture - as where Jane was
editing - choose to ignore women even when they are disagreeing with them
or, in their eyes, acting outrageous, then that observation would not hold.
CM
On 12/30/2014 10:21 AM, Jane Darnell wrote:
Hmm. I stopped editing the Dutch Wikipedia because it just wasn't any
fun anymore. I would never say I experienced barriers to entry or that
there were barriers to continued participation. It is more that there was a
continuous vacuum of silence that made participation feel like I was on an
island all of the time. I was never invited to the discussion table on any
specific subject, and if I stumbled across one, once there, my replies to
statements were never answered directly, but indirectly in replies to
others. I was never addressed personally and asked for an opinion. That
doesn't happen regularly on Commons or the English Wikipedia either, but I
feel much less on an island in bth of those projects and much more a part
of a community. Any contribution I made to an ongoing discussion on the
Dutch Wikipedia just stopped the discussion altogether or was simply
ignored. I vaguely remember a few deletion discussions where my objections
were brushed off with ridiculous arguments - so ridiculous that I wouldn't
know what to reply in all seriousness. Of course I can't back this up with
diffs and it is just a feeling, but it's because of the feeling that I
stopped contributing. I guess I also got tired of always linking to
redlinks in my area of interest - there are just more people working in my
area of interest on the English Wikipedia, so that I feel I can lean more
on the work of others.
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Carol Moore dc <
carolmooredc(a)verizon.net> wrote:
This point is so important I gave it its own
subject line. Perhaps
this language can be worked into the statement of purpose of all the WMF
Gender gap projects... I also think Kerry should turn her whole excellent
statement into an essay for the WMF site and it should be linked from GGTF
main page.
On 12/29/2014 4:07 PM, Kerry Raymond wrote:
Does it matter? Believe me, a lot of people get really stuck at this
point and frame it as “well, if women don’t want to edit Wikipedia, does it
really matter? It’s their choice, isn’t it?” This is something that really
needs to get reframed. Yes, of course, many women don’t Wikipedia because
they simply aren’t interested in doing so (ditto many men). But there are
barriers to entry and barriers to continued participation by women who are
interested in doing so compared to men. Try to reframe it “are women
equally able to edit Wikipedia” or “are there barriers to women editing?”.
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing,
please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing listGendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please
visit:https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please
visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
--
Sarah Stierch
-----
Diverse and engaging consulting for your organization.
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please
visit: