IMO, this section of the Commons Sexually explicit content policy was well
received by most people discussing it. It is only controversial among a
subsection of editors who do image categorizing in this area and want the
issue to be black and white that everything in the image should be
identified and add to the matching category.
Sydney
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:31 PM, ChaoticFluffy <chaoticfluffy(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
This seems reasonable to me, though I'm a little
wary of drawing the line
so firmly just in case there's a case I'm not thinking of where sexual image
would best illustrate something on a non-sexual page.
-Fluff
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Ryan Kaldari <rkaldari(a)wikimedia.org>wrote;wrote:
Yep, try
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:People_using_vacuum_cleaners
So do we all agree that the Principle of Least Astonishment needs to be
encoded into some kind of policy or guideline? In other words, images with a
sexual context should only appear in articles/categories that also have a
sexual context.
Ryan Kaldari
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap