well, they did not revdel it.
arbcom can drive the discussion off wiki,
but cannot ban the Guardian for "bad journalism"
certain account behaviors are being favored
you should expect to see a lot more of those behaviors in the future
this will necessitate a lot of wiki-splaining
thank-you arbcom for firing up every up coming feminist editathon
you may not care how how you are perceived,
but the negative blowback will tarnish all of wikimedia
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 12:06 AM, Ryan Kaldari <rkaldari(a)wikimedia.org>
wrote:
The rediculous thing is that none of the people
defending that article
were 'feminists'. They were just defending the mainstream point of view
from an endless onslaught of 8channers. The feminist point view isn't even
represented in the article.
On Jan 23, 2015, at 7:14 PM, J Hayes <slowking4(a)gmail.com> wrote:
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/jan/23/wikipedia-bans-editors-fr…
http://internet.gawker.com/wikipedia-purged-a-group-of-feminist-editors-bec…
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please
visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please
visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap