nope - this was an incident at wikiconUSA 2015 apparently nothing done which has impacted the credibility of arbcom and susa (i was not witness, but i find the complainants credible)
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:54 PM, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
I'm unfamiliar with this situation, but if there's a functionary whose off-wiki behavior calls into question of the appropriateness of his/her continuing to have access to PII, please do forward that information to SuSa, the Ombudsman Committee, and/or (as applicable) the local arbitration committee that would have the ability to investigate the situation.
Pine
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:29 PM, J Hayes slowking4@gmail.com wrote:
yes, that functionary and his behavior on meta has chilled the participation of some librarian editors they are highly skeptical of wiki harrassment efforts as long as he is in a position to see personal identifying information. they do not trust check user to be done responsibly as well
this is impacting our efforts to engage a GLAM institution.
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Neotarf neotarf@gmail.com wrote:
Speaking of dox and in-person events, a few months ago one of the WP:BADSITES known for dox had a thread about attending a WMF harassment workshop. So anyone who is not comfortable with a paper trail, and would prefer face-to-face conversations with allies, could actually find themselves face to face with their harassers instead.
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap