I'm unfamiliar with this situation, but if there's a functionary whose off-wiki behavior calls into question of the appropriateness of his/her continuing

to have access to PII, please do forward that information to SuSa, the Ombudsman Committee, and/or (as applicable) the local arbitration committee
that would have the ability to investigate the situation.

Pine

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:29 PM, J Hayes <slowking4@gmail.com> wrote:

yes, that functionary and his behavior on meta has chilled the participation of some librarian editors

they are highly skeptical of wiki harrassment efforts as long as he is in a position to see personal identifying information.

they do not trust check user to be done responsibly as well

this is impacting our efforts to engage a GLAM institution.

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Neotarf <neotarf@gmail.com> wrote:

Speaking of dox and in-person events, a few months ago one of the
WP:BADSITES known for dox had a thread about attending a WMF
harassment workshop. So anyone who is not comfortable with a paper
trail, and would prefer face-to-face conversations with allies, could
actually find themselves face to face with their harassers instead.

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap