Questionable just means one has questions. So it's nice, unlike the other words which I was contrasting with questionable - not using to describe my specific questions on specific articles in that particular AfD list. See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Feminism/Article_alerts
But frankly I do wonder why two people on this list nominate brand new articles related to women for deletion rather than improving them.
HOWEVER -- the specifics should be discussed at the relevant AfD pages, so if this little dust up gets people there, goody goody!! :-)
CM
On 8/26/2012 11:01 AM, Cynthia Ashley-Nelson wrote:
Or that I nominated the B.a.B.e article for those reasons? Let's assume good faith here.
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Thomas Morton <morton.thomas@googlemail.com mailto:morton.thomas@googlemail.com> wrote:
On 26 August 2012 15:16, Carol Moore DC <carolmooredc@verizon.net <mailto:carolmooredc@verizon.net>> wrote: On 8/26/2012 9:58 AM, Thomas Morton wrote:Right now there are 3 questionable AfD's and various nominations, etc. Plus a bunch of Good article nominees and other listings. On a "fostering friendly atmosphere" note; characterising actions as "questionable" is not very nice. TomQuestionable is being nice. "shitty" "sexist" "woman hating BS" is what is not very nice - in a wikipedia context, anyway... :-) CM Are you /seriously /implying I nominated the Tod Akin article for those reasons? Tom _______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap--
Best regards,
Cindy Ashley-Nelson "Yes. /Her again./" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cindamuse
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap