Questionable just means one has questions.  So it's nice, unlike the other words which I was contrasting with questionable - not using to describe my specific questions on specific articles in that particular AfD list.  See:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Feminism/Article_alerts

But frankly I do wonder why two people on this list nominate brand new articles related to women for deletion rather than improving them. 

HOWEVER --  the specifics should be discussed at the relevant AfD pages, so if this little dust up gets people there, goody goody!! :-)

CM

On 8/26/2012 11:01 AM, Cynthia Ashley-Nelson wrote:
Or that I nominated the B.a.B.e article for those reasons? Let's assume good faith here.



On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Thomas Morton <morton.thomas@googlemail.com> wrote:
On 26 August 2012 15:16, Carol Moore DC <carolmooredc@verizon.net> wrote:
On 8/26/2012 9:58 AM, Thomas Morton wrote:
Right now there are 3 questionable AfD's and various nominations, etc.  Plus a bunch of Good article nominees and other listings.


On a "fostering friendly atmosphere" note; characterising actions as "questionable" is not very nice.

Tom 

Questionable is being nice.  "shitty" "sexist" "woman hating BS" is what is not very nice - in a wikipedia context, anyway... :-)

CM

Are you seriously implying I nominated the Tod Akin article for those reasons?

Tom

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap




--

Best regards,

Cindy Ashley-Nelson
"Yes. Her again."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cindamuse



_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap