I think one thing that could help is to reclaim the GGTF. The thing is to
remain unflappable and ignore The Troll.
On Jan 24, 2015 9:36 AM, "Sarah" <slimvirgin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 7:26 AM, J Hayes
<slowking4(a)gmail.com> wrote:
well, they did not revdel it.
arbcom can drive the discussion off wiki,
but cannot ban the Guardian for "bad journalism"
certain account behaviors are being favored
you should expect to see a lot more of those behaviors in the future
this will necessitate a lot of wiki-splaining
thank-you arbcom for firing up every up coming feminist editathon
you may not care how how you are perceived,
but the negative blowback will tarnish all of wikimedia
Smallbones has suggested
<https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AWikiProject_Countering_systemic_bias%2FGender_gap_task_force&diff=643969579&oldid=643910647>
on the GGTF talk page that a group of Wikipedians petition the Foundation
to
"take steps to identify and remove institutionalized sexism on
Wikipedia."
One issue that has concerned me is that editors who care about these
issues don't combine our weight. We have the GGTF, this mailing list, the
Twitter and Facebook accounts, but we don't act with one voice when it
matters. I'm not sure of the reasons for that, but I think it damages our
efforts. What can we do to start pulling together more?
Sarah
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please
visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap