On 2016-07-08 10:01 AM, Chris Keating wrote:
Interestingly, I couldn't see any sign of the
Committee's decision
being informed by the WMF's consultation on the future of Wikimania,
or anyone from the WMF's community engagement department being present.
Wikimania is, and always was, a community led and organized event. The
WMF, as its traditional biggest sponsor[1], has a great deal of
influence in the matter - but ultimately no decision power beyond "fund
and resource or not".
The committee's decision has indeed taken into account the consultation
you refer to - as well as the roundtable discussion on the "Future of
Wikimania" that took place earlier[2]. Our evaluation, which is
reflected in that resolution, is that the consultation was clearly
flawed and that its conclusion does not reflect consensus - neither of
the community members who organize nor of those who attend Wikimania.
-- Coren / Marc
[1] Although "underwrite" might be a better term - the WMF has pretty
much shouldered the vast majority of the costs and given the most
logistical support year in and year out.
[2] Where the consensus was to overwhelmingly reject that consultation's
conclusion in favor or continuing with Wikimania as a yearly even given
its irreplaceable role in our movement.