Geni, youre not being very helpful with your notions about what "reality suggests" or what is "acerdemic" or what "isn't posible" or "imposible." I never thought Id say it, but for your own sake... use a spellchecker.
Similar wheel wars have arisen which have been handled better, some even with special attention. The community apparently has learned to deal better with these. Apparently there is now some process review procedure for when the Arbcom screws up. Glad to help clarify holes in the process. Of course I may be fooling myself, but I am under the impression that its desirable for editors who make useful edits to have sysop privelidges. Its not just a "janitorial" role.
Teenage sysops who like to push their uselessly terse comments as "reality" might make yourselves more useful by taking care of some WP:RQM . Apparently theres a backlog.
S
--- geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
Arcom persident suggests you need permission from arbcom to reapply.
Reality suggests the point is acerdemic in any case (not that it is imposible just that it isn't posible through RFA).
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com