Geni, youre not being very helpful with your notions about what "reality
suggests" or
what is "acerdemic" or what "isn't posible" or
"imposible." I never thought Id say it,
but for your own sake... use a spellchecker.
Similar wheel wars have arisen which have been handled better, some even with special
attention. The community apparently has learned to deal better with these. Apparently
there is now some process review procedure for when the Arbcom screws up. Glad to help
clarify holes in the process. Of course I may be fooling myself, but I am under the
impression that its desirable for editors who make useful edits to have sysop
privelidges. Its not just a "janitorial" role.
Teenage sysops who like to push their uselessly terse comments as "reality"
might make
yourselves more useful by taking care of some WP:RQM . Apparently theres a backlog.
S
--- geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Arcom persident suggests you need permission from
arbcom to reapply.
Reality suggests the point is acerdemic in any case (not that it is
imposible just that it isn't posible through RFA).
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com