Hi Andrew,
I would also look at edit tags [1], which capture many edits from OAuth-based tools that don't leave an identifying word in the edit summary field (example: reCh [2]). You can query these using the change tag table [3].
[1] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:Tags (may take some time to load)
[2] e.g. https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?limit=50&title=Special%3AContributi...
[3] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Change_tag_table
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 7:34 PM, Andrew Hall hall1467@umn.edu wrote:
Hello,
I’m doing some analyses in which I want to identify Wikidata edits done via editing tools (e.g. via QuickStatements, etc…). To identify these edits, I've first flagged and removed bot edits and then I’ve generated a list of the 1000 most popular revision comment words (ignoring case and some punctuation characters as part of this process). Within this list of words, I've identified 15 words that I believe indicate tool edits. I’ve included these 15 words below.
Does anyone know of tool edits that would be missed if I search for revisions that contain one of these 15 words in their comments? Put another way, are there editing tools not listed below? If so, can I identify edits from those tools from revision comments?
#quickstatements #petscan #autolist2 autoedit nameguzzler labellister #itemcreator #dragrefjs [[useryms/lc|lcjs]] #wikidatagame [[wikidataprimary #mix'n'match mix'n'match #distributedgame [[userjitrixis/nameguzzlerjs|nameguzzler]]
Thanks in advance, Andrew Hall
Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata