Hoi,
<grin> adding sources to labels, REALLY </grin>That would be a novelty.
More seriously though. When a disease is not a disease when in 2016 a lot
of substances are associated with it, It becomes really relevant to know
the efficacy. There is a lot of science on the placebo effect and there is
a lot of research to the effect of attention. The point is that a substance
with attention (this is typically what research in psychiatry is) will do
better than either of the two alone. So how do we indicate efficacy?
Thanks,
GerardM
On 16 May 2016 at 17:26, John Erling Blad <jeblad(a)gmail.com> wrote:
There was a previous statement about an entity which
is now deprecated.
You may as well add a source stating why it is deprecated.
On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 7:55 PM, Smolenski Nikola <smolensk(a)eunet.rs>
wrote:
Citiranje Gerard Meijssen
<gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com>om>:
I have stopped expecting necessary changes from
Wikidata. It has been
made
clear that dates will be associated with labels.
By the way we can and
do
already indicate the validity of facts on time.
I can't see why would dates be associated with labels. Can someone
explain?
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata