Hoi,

<grin> adding sources to labels, REALLY </grin>That would be a novelty.

More seriously though. When a disease is not a disease when in 2016 a lot of substances are associated with it, It becomes really relevant to know the efficacy. There is a lot of science on the placebo effect and there is a lot of research to the effect of attention. The point is that a substance with attention (this is typically what research in psychiatry is) will do better than either of the two alone. So how do we indicate efficacy?

Thanks,

GerardM

On 16 May 2016 at 17:26, John Erling Blad <jeblad@gmail.com> wrote:

There was a previous statement about an entity which is now deprecated. You may as well add a source stating why it is deprecated.

On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 7:55 PM, Smolenski Nikola <smolensk@eunet.rs> wrote:
Citiranje Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen@gmail.com>:
> I have stopped expecting necessary changes from Wikidata. It has been made
> clear that dates will be associated with labels. By the way we can and do
> already indicate the validity of facts on time.

I can't see why would dates be associated with labels. Can someone explain?

_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata

_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata