And that helps me how? Most awards have been won by more than one
person. If I know that Q99999 has won the Nobel Prize in literature,
and I know a fact about Patrick Modiano, should I add that fact to
Q99999 or should I create a new item?
André
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Gerard Meijssen
<gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hoi,
Typically such items were created because the article about the award
mentions them. So it is all a matter of perspective. When the award is
leading, the information about an award winner is in the article on the
award. Having all these awardees on the article is not so great, it is not
what we do.
Impossible? Certainly not. Reat the damn article (on the award).
Thanks,
GerardM
On 31 May 2015 at 17:06, Daniel Kinzler <daniel.kinzler(a)wikimedia.de> wrote:
Am 31.05.2015 um 15:21 schrieb Gerard Meijssen:
Hoi,
When someone or something received an award, it is needed if only to
complete
the list of recipients of that award.. There is no benchmark for enough
information. The notion that you a Nobel award winner is not relevant is
poppycock. With automated descriptions awards do show.
If you have an item that says someone whon a nobel prize, but not when or
which,
and also does *noit* have a label, that items is quite useless; it'S
impossible
to tell which person it is even referring to.
That is what markus is talking about. For people, if there is a label, we
already have pretty good info. But if there is no label, we have a
problem, and
if there isn't any other identifying info,m the item is useless.
--
Daniel Kinzler
Senior Software Developer
Wikimedia Deutschland
Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V.
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata