Most of my reviewing for conference and journals was double blind, although the effectiveness of it was always a bit questionable, as in many cases you can, as a reviewer, identify the author from the style and argument. This tends to get worse in specialised areas, where the pool of researchers is necessarily small.
Adam
On 7 November 2012 06:16, Kerry Raymond kerry.raymond@gmail.com wrote:
I cannot speak for other disciplines but double-blind is not standard in Computer Science. ****
Kerry****
Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l