Most of my reviewing for conference and journals was double blind, although the effectiveness of it was always a bit questionable, as in many cases you can, as a reviewer, identify the author from the style and argument. This tends to get worse in specialised areas, where the pool of researchers is necessarily small.

Adam


On 7 November 2012 06:16, Kerry Raymond <kerry.raymond@gmail.com> wrote:

I cannot speak for other disciplines but double-blind is not standard in Computer Science.

 

Kerry

 

 


_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l