I confess I had too much fun sparring with them yesterday, but had
enough and don't feel like responding to last half dozen responses to
myself, or those to lots of others who were sympathetic to the views of
so many women on Wikipedia.
The "arguments" are so much like the harassment we got on GGTF, though
with more direct insults. Basically: Prove there's sexism; prove that
more articles about or by women are AfD'd; prove that you women aren't
just a lot of victim whiners who just need to man up. Plus various
absurd ruminations on the wickedness of women in general...
Unfortunately, I haven't looked at what's currently easily available on
either Wikipedia/GGTF or Wikimedia/Gender gap as links that answer these
most typical questions... Too tired today...
Been watching Benghazi hearing and see the same old thing: harass
Hillary with petty nonsense to make her look bad. But don't identify
the real crime: did securing the weapons mean rounding them up for
rebels in Syria, something that would be illegal under US law? Were the
attackers pissed off cause US wouldn't give THEM the weapons?
Like on Wikipedia, harass a woman for every little misspeak or misstep
but don't admit the real issue is you hate a) women and/or b) their POV
on some issue(s) and want them gone.
Of course the difference is many Republicans (like McCain) supported
arming the Syrian rebels. However, generally those with similar POVs on
Wikipedia don't attack each other unrelentingly, even if they are
females. Then it's "you take your allies where you can get them."