I confess I had too much fun sparring with them yesterday, but had enough and don't feel like responding to last half dozen responses to myself, or those to lots of others who were sympathetic to the views of so many women on Wikipedia.
The "arguments" are so much like the harassment we got on GGTF, though with more direct insults. Basically: Prove there's sexism; prove that more articles about or by women are AfD'd; prove that you women aren't just a lot of victim whiners who just need to man up. Plus various absurd ruminations on the wickedness of women in general...
Unfortunately, I haven't looked at what's currently easily available on either Wikipedia/GGTF or Wikimedia/Gender gap as links that answer these most typical questions... Too tired today...
Been watching Benghazi hearing and see the same old thing: harass Hillary with petty nonsense to make her look bad. But don't identify the real crime: did securing the weapons mean rounding them up for rebels in Syria, something that would be illegal under US law? Were the attackers pissed off cause US wouldn't give THEM the weapons?
Like on Wikipedia, harass a woman for every little misspeak or misstep but don't admit the real issue is you hate a) women and/or b) their POV on some issue(s) and want them gone.
Of course the difference is many Republicans (like McCain) supported arming the Syrian rebels. However, generally those with similar POVs on Wikipedia don't attack each other unrelentingly, even if they are females. Then it's "you take your allies where you can get them."