On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 6:36 AM, Neotarf <neotarf(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Any journalists in future wanting examples of it need
only read those
archives and the dispute-resolution threads that failed to deal with it
(which one of us ought to compile at some point).
An interesting idea. What would such a compilation look like? (Spoken as
someone who used to write the Arbitration Report for the *Signpost*).
Neotarf
Hi Neotarf,
I think the GGTF page from June to December may become important for
journalists and even historians because it makes clear how entrenched and
overt the sexism is. The dispute-resolution threads on AN, AN/I and various
talk pages show women either failing to get help for a situation that
should have been a no-brainer, or getting it only after protracted
discussion.
The difficulty is that the threads are scattered, and there are threads
that are directly and indirectly related to GGTF. It would be a good idea
to compile a list of these threads that we can post on the GGTF archives
(perhaps as a template), so that everything is easy to find.