On Nov 27, 2014 9:55 AM, "Carol Moore dc" <carolmooredc(a)verizon.net>
wrote:
The study's talk page has ongoing discussions of
people being annoyed about this issue. Probably first place any updates will show up:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_Editor_Survey_2012
I wrote there:
See
[
http://mako.cc/copyrighteous/the-wikipedia-gender-gap-revisited Mako's study] which
includes the initial numbers from before his changes. I thought the study results were
already released by the time he did the study but maybe I'm wrong. Anyway at least
there are numbers. But IMHO absolute numbers are not as important as change rates over
time. (which has been the topic of debate among researchers not too long ago also) --~~~~
-Jeremy
P.S. haven't read the arbcom case or any of the onwiki discussion but
I generally support points I've seen on these threads from Sarah
Stierch.
P.P.S. Everyone who is having turkey, etc. today should enjoy it. :)