http://toolserver.org/~magnus/glamorous.php?doit=Do+it!&category=Nude+po... answer George's question. It takes a while loading and it isn't worksafe - unless you can get away with thumbnails
-Ole.
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 1:10 AM, George Herbert george.herbert@gmail.comwrote:
I'm at work and can't really get away with looking at the gallery images from here without trouble. However...
Has anyone looked at them to see where (if anywhere) they are in use on projects?
-george
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Nathan nawrich@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sure EVula knew that Commoners wouldn't abide his deletion of their fap galleries. They've never liked it much before, and this gallery is even nerdy! Double whammy. The uploader freaked out with inspiring rapidity.
The arguments given in a previous deletion review are instructive; only the most mechanical reading of the project scope policy, in the way most charitable to retaining pornographic collections, were even considered. The closer said, paraphrasing: "Pornographic? Sure, don't care. Objectifies women? Sure, don't care. Not useful on another Wikimedia project? Sure, don't care. It was on Flickr, so they must have consented to publication on Commons, case closed."
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
-- -george william herbert george.herbert@gmail.com
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap