On 06/05/2012 09:53 AM, Risker wrote:
place where we can continue to illustrate the contributions of women to many fields would be to include their peer-reviewed scholarly works as references in our articles. I am not saying that this should be done in
That could also be an interesting research project too. What is the balance of the gender of (primary) others in Wikipedia bibliographies, and how does it compare among the top scholars in the related field? (That is, is Wikipedia more or less distorted than the field itself?) (If anyone is interested, I already have code to do a lot of this.)