Anyone know a medical doctor/gyno who can perhaps provide some type of
documentation/review of the content?
Not sure if it would ever matter...but, a solid letter and such could help maybe..
I haven't looked at the article, I admit, it's a subject I'm not comfortable
"examining"
Another example of why medical support could be beneficial to Wikipedia as a whole.
Sarah (Stierch)
Sent via iPhone - I apologize in advance for my shortness or errors! :)
On Sep 17, 2011, at 10:51 PM, The Richardsons <donsav2(a)optonline.net> wrote:
On 9/17/2011 3:00 PM,
Sarah Stierch
wrote:
The choices are really mediocre for the "neckline" women's section. One
of
the photos is titled "Boobies.jpg."
I saw that “boobies.jpg” was changed to “Cleavage (breasts).jpg” about four hours ago by
Mattbuck. +1 for Gendergap!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
That was the good news
The bad news is that, from earlier posts about labiaplasty, it seemed that users wanted
to remove the picture from the page, but that others put it back up. What I believe is
that you had no right to take the picture off without consensus. Please excuse me if I
missed something that would prove that there was consensus otherwise. Again, though, what
troubles me is that SlimVirgin did get talked to rudely, being mockingly (in my opinion)
called an “Administratrix” and being told to “play by the rules you claim to enforce”.
Also, you seem to be right in saying that the picture isn’t a “hypertrophy” (although I
wouldn’t know) and I am pleased to see that a note was added early this morning UTC.
But my main problem is how we get to reach a consensus on this, by, which we
certainly can, by questioning its “licensed medical image” status, pointing out that it is
two different people, and pointing out that the labia minora are not hypertrophies.
--- RDW2210
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap