A lot of this surgery is cosmetic surgery, thus it is a matter of taste, not a matter of dysfunction or normality. And, usually, is quite private and nobody's business. So, I don't see a problem so long as the cosmetic aspect is clear.
There is a plastic surgeon who specializes in this area that has uploaded many images for promotional purposes. I'm pretty sure he has quit by now. That was several years ago.
Fred
I don't know whether this is worth bothering about, but it's the kind of thing that concerns me. Anyone not wanting to look at genitalia should not click on the links.
I came across [[Labiaplasty]], while looking for material on female genital mutilation. There's an image on the page of what is supposed to be before and after a labiaplasty.
The previous caption implied that it was the same woman, though it doesn't look like it -- for one thing, larger versions of the images on the Commons show one has a mole on her abdomen and the other doesn't.
What really bothers me is the "before" image shows a woman within a normal range, yet we are presenting this as something in need of surgery. I'm concerned that young women could stumble on this and start to doubt themselves.
The image and upload history are here -- http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hypertrophy_of_Labia_Minora_before_an...
There's no indication that these are "medical" images; no indication of model release; no reliable sources indicating that the "oversized" one really is regarded as such; and the images were uploaded by occasionally used accounts.
I've twice removed the image from the article, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Labiaplasty&action=historysubm... and I've left a note on talk, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Labiaplasty#Image but it is being restored. If anyone wants to jump in, please do. If not, no worries. I'll completely understand if you would all prefer not to comment.
Sarah
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap