On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Arnaud HERVE arnaudherve@x-mail.net wrote:
Well I might have been too quick in judging him, and besides idiocy or perversion the reason of his behaviour might have been a complete lack of attention. To the point that he didn't even have a look at the photo, because if he did and still protected the photo, then I am back at the idiocy or perversity hypothesis.
If I understand correctly, one of your concerns are regarding the image name. An invalid name isn't a good reason to delete an image, as images can be renamed.