On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Arnaud HERVE <arnaudherve(a)x-mail.net> wrote:
Well I might have been too quick in judging him, and
besides idiocy or
perversion the reason of his behaviour might have been a complete lack of
attention. To the point that he didn't even have a look at the photo,
because if he did and still protected the photo, then I am back at the
idiocy or perversity hypothesis.
If I understand correctly, one of your concerns are regarding the
image name. An invalid name isn't a good reason to delete an image,
as images can be renamed.
--
John Vandenberg