Sarah
Speak for yourself. I'm also a woman and i don't see that "you're not welcome" in his comment, and also can't see why that particular comment would in some way made girls run out commons. _____ *Béria Lima* Wikimedia Portugal http://wikimedia.pt (351) 963 953 042
*Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. É isso o que estamos a fazer.*
2011/5/23 Sarah slimvirgin@gmail.com
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 16:32, Bob Sponge metzgerhandwerk.hat.tradition@googlemail.com wrote:
dear sarah
i want to give you a small feedback about your entries here about a comment i did. (i found this list with a notice on my userpage in the german wikipedia)
"Pro i like her big tits :-) Bunnyfrosch (Diskussion) 22:59, 2 January 2011 (UTC)"
there were 2 contra votes before, one argued not educational and questioned: "Why manga woman rhymes with big tits?" the other replies the "not educational" accusation. both arguments are bullshit in my opinion. because all is educational or nothing, but i am to obliging to told a another users his/her meaning is bullshit. for example if i want to know how a piece of shit looks like, a picture of a piece of shit ist educational, and if i want to know something about the frontieres of texas, a picture of a map coult very helpfully/educational. if people naming something not educational, they want to say somthing diffrent. ( note this is my personal pov!) but they vote this way, but really really often simply mean: "i hate this pic" or "i hate this user" or "i hate every kind of nudity in the commons"
in german i often give persons a longer feedback, in english i spare the longer feedback. (you can read why^^) so i choose a short pro vote, applying to the first contra. and by the way, i am not addicted to big or small boobs - i couldn't care less! if i had choose a longer explanation for my vote, it would like: "wikipedia needs well draught anime pictures, with common licences, this one is a great animation of a girl or transsexual in a beautyfull landscape". so, thats the reason i vote with pro.
but there was no need for a argumentaion, when the contra-side argues with "not educational"
i hope this will help you, to understand my diction in the comment.
best regards le frog du rabbit
Bob, thanks for your explanation. It's appreciated.
The thing is this: some of us would like to attract more women editors to Wikipedia, so that women have more of a voice, and perhaps also to change the culture of Wikipedia a little.
It's arguably not in a woman's interests to hang around on a talk page where people are posting about big tits. It may be in the project's interests to have more women there, but it's hard to see how it could be in the interests of the individual women.
It doesn't really matter what the intention is behind the words, because all we see are the words themselves. For some women (not all, but some), these words effectively mean, "The way you see the world is not represented here," or "Go away."
That's one of the reasons it's a problem.
Sarah
Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap